Abraham Lincoln seldom got the chance to go to school. He received fewer than 12
months of schooling. Congressman Lincoln, it was reported, once said that a Georgia
colleague was "an eloquent man, and a man of learning; so far as he could judge of
learning, not being learned himself." Such self-deprecation came naturally. Lincoln's
friend Joshua Speed noted that Lincoln "was never ashamed, so far as I know, to admit
his ignorance upon any subject, or of the meaning of any word, no matter how ridiculous
it might make him appear."
In the campaign biography that journalist John L. Scripps prepared for Lincoln's 1860
campaign for president, Scripps wrote that among the books that Lincoln had "read in
early life, I took the liberty of adding 'Plutarch's Lives.' I take it for granted that you had
read that book. If you have not, then you must read it at once to make my statement
good." Lincoln was amused by Scripps' presumption, but he followed Scripps' instruction
and "read it through."
Scripps had accurately enumerated many of the books that Lincoln had read as part of his
self-education. Reading supplemented the little formal schooling he received. Of his
education, Lincoln recalled that "no qualification [was] ever required of a teacher,
beyond readin, writin, and cipherin, to the Rule of Three. If a straggler supposed to
understand latin, happened to sojourn in the neighborhood, he was looked upon as a
wizzard."
Lacking a classical education in the classroom, Lincoln nevertheless read the classics of
English literature. He became a lifelong student of the Bible, Shakespeare and the poetry
of Robert Burns. In the autobiography he prepared in 1859, Lincoln described his
rudimentary schooling and added: "The little advance I now have upon this store of
education, I have picked up from time to time under the pressure of necessity."
As a young politician, Lincoln honed his understanding of political philosophy and public
policy by participating in debating societies and political speech-making. His preference
for reading aloud whatever came into his hands annoyed law partner William H.
Herndon, who thought that Lincoln "read less and thought more than any man in his
sphere in America."
The nation's 16th president was less self-conscious about his lack of education than was
the first, George Washington, whose own education was cut short when his father died
when Washington was 11 - depriving him of the opportunity to be schooled in England
like his older half-brothers. America's first president described his own education as
"defective." Washington pushed to have his step-son attend what became Columbia
College in New York City; unfortunately, education was far less important to "Jack" than
to George. Jack dropped out. Lincoln had better luck getting his son into Harvard, then
law school.
With little professional guidance or previous education, President Lincoln had made
himself into a lawyer with two years of self-study.
Both the first and 16th presidents mastered and appreciated Euclid, whom Lincoln
studied as a middle-aged lawyer. After the Revolution, Washington saw the expansion of
national power "as plain as any problem in Euclid" (Letter from George Washington to
Benjamin Harrison, January 18 1784; PWCF, Volume I, pp. 56-57). Both Lincoln and
Washington had learned practical mathematics by mastering surveying as young men.
The two presidents' intellectual curiosity lasted a lifetime. Union Army officer James
Grant Wilson told of dining with President Lincoln and Secretary of State William H.
Seward at the White House when Seward showed Lincoln a new gold medal. Wilson
asked, "What is the obverse of the medal, Mr. President." Lincoln turned to Seward and
commented: "I suppose by his obverse the Colonel means t'other side" (Rufus Rockwell
Wilson, editor, Intimate Memories of Lincoln, p. 423; James Grant Wilson, Putnam's
Magazine, February and March, 1909).
Three decades earlier, at age 23, Lincoln had begun his political career by declaring:
"That every man may receive at least, a moderate education, and thereby be enabled to
read the histories of his own and other countries, by which he may duly appreciate the
value of our free institutions, appears to be an object of vital importance."